Answer: Unfortunately, the problem you describe is a fairly widespread practice and a question that we often receive from different parties. Many shippers charge their customers for goods in excess of what the shipper actually pays and do not pass on to their customers the discounts or allowances they receive from carriers. In some cases, it can be an important profit center for the sender. If a formal agreement distracts readers from your post, it`s time to apply a fictitious agreement instead. Concordance usually involves the concordance of the value of a grammatical category between different elements of a sentence (or sometimes between sentences, as in some cases where a pronoun is needed to match its predecessor or speaker). Some categories that often trigger grammatical concordance are listed below. Correspondence based on a grammatical person is mainly between the verb and the subject. An example from English (I the vs is) has been indicated in the introduction of this article. Another characteristic is the concordance in the participations, which have different forms for different sexes: 9. In sentences beginning with “there are” or “there are”, the subject follows the verb. Since “there” is not the subject, the verb corresponds to the following. It is not illegal to charge damages on transport costs due to carriers, but there are some repercussions on possible late penalties if the carrier does not agree. See “Freight Claims in Plain English” (3rd ed.

1995) in section 12.3.6 for a full discussion of this topic. In some cases, adjectives and participations as predicates in Swedish, Norwegian and Danish do not seem to correspond to their subjects.